Reviews from

The Phenomenon's of Light

A sunrise mirage

50 total reviews 
Comment from Robotkin


Despite all your explanations (it does'nt need any !) your capture stands above it all making it a memorable and high quality pic which is quite beatiful in its symmetry and composition... A certain prize winner...Rob

 Comment Written 22-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you Rob, I appreciate your favorable review very much. Sorry for responding late.
Comment from AntheaGrace


How else could you take this and not get the best out of it!! You certainly caught something special so 5* presentationa dnc omposition...I like how it darkens in the centre and then lightens up again at the fore ground reflection, beautiful colour and I lobe the fiery-golden highlights detailing the clouds at cntre focus...beautiful, peaceful atmopheric shot..love it

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you so much for your throughout and kind review, Sorry for my late response.
Comment from wolf6249107


this is a great sunset you captured here and as far as centering my friend that enhances this photo greatly
your techs are great on it as well
great story capabilities

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you very much for your complimentary review. Sorry for being late.
Comment from Alexemch


Lovely, lovely capture! I love the sun at the centre of this shot (where else could it be I ask myself!) and the rays spreading out spectacularly from it's core. Fantastic and sorry I have not a 6 for you. Wonder if the scene momentarily looked something like that when the meteor hit the earth in the Yucatan peninsular 65million years ago? Fascinating ..and thanks for sharing this.

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you so much for your complimentary review. Maybe the sky was afire similar 65 million years ago but I think the ocean wasn't this calm back then.
    Thank you for the thought of a 6. Don't worry about, your review is of more value than any 6. Sorry forb my late response.
Comment from AntonH


Whatever the scientists say, this is a very attractive shot. Centering was certainly the right decision as the radiating sunrays provide a symmetry that should not be broken. However, I do think that cropping to just above the top of the rays to provide a panoramic effect gives more impact - never mind the rule of thirds! But still a 5* photograph.

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you so much Anton for your review and suggestion. Sorry I disagree, I did the crop and didn't like it. For me it was of less impact. It looks somehow faked, very decorative but not natural. I like the somehow strange lighted sky above. But I could wrong maybe because I saw it happen in nature and there is the full view. Beside this, the crop looks to much like an regular sunrise to me, not like a mirage. I'm may be wrong, but that's how I see it.
reply by AntonH on 25-Nov-2009
    There's no need to apolgise for disagreeing! I fully understand you wanting to retain the full image as you experienced it.
    Best wishes
    Anton
reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you, I fully understand. I appreciate your effort very much. It would be boring when we all would see and think the same.
    Cleo
Comment from RaineC


There was a saying by Achilles in the movie "Troy" when he was sparing with his nephew Patroclus in the ruins. Patroclus says, "I thought you said never change my sword hands."... and Achilles responds, "When you are ready for that, you will no longer need to take direction from me."
You are at a point in your photography that you know when to break the code... they are more like guidelines, anyways. (laughs and winks) ... nice job.

~Raine

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you so much. What a compliment especially from an advanced photographer as you.
    Sorry for being late again, seams I'm unable to catch up.
reply by RaineC on 25-Nov-2009
    Cleo, I don't think myself to be advanced... I think you are a great photographer.. a peer.
reply by the author on 26-Nov-2009
    Makes two of us, I think the same of you.
Comment from xennia


Beautiful sunset photo, I love the effect you have captured and presented here, whatever it is. Excellent composition with beautiful sea and sky. colors are stunning. Did you try to take some photo with the different f than 4,5? Thanks for sharing this beauty.

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you so much Xennia. Yes I took a couple other photos but there wasn't much time for experiment. It was there for only a couple minutes or less. Then it got dark again and I thought first the sun is behind some clouds before the real sunrise occurred and I realised that I just had seen and captured a mirage. The real sunrise wasn't nearly as spectacular as this Fatah Morgana.
    Sorry for responding late.
Comment from TimeSnatcher


Well, I'm no scientist either so your references were lost on me :) But I think I know a good photo when I see it (except for my own) and this is lovely. I agree, It had to be centered and teh whole composition works beautifully.

Cheers,
Maggie

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you so much Maggie. I'm very sorry for my late response.
Comment from Garry.Copeland


Initial Impact 5
Creativity of presentation 5
Center of interest 4
Story telling 4
Colour Harmony 5
Technical Excellence 5
Lighting 5

I'd never heard of this 'No Centering rule' until I joined this site and I'm partially with you in that centering is the only way to go with this image on the vertical anyway. Following these rules potentially removes your creative options do what's right for the image.

Good composition all round with big sky allowing the 'sun rays' to expand and fill the composition.

Whatever the science behind this is a lovely image to view.

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you so much Gary, I don't think that there is a 'not centering rule', it's more a like or dislike position. I think it's the rule of thirds what we talk on the site but that rule doesn't say you couldn't center at least as I read it. In my oppinion rules are guidelines we have to know, but they are flexible. It's art and not mathematics. Sorry for responding late.
reply by Garry.Copeland on 25-Nov-2009
    Thanks for saying that, I'd never heard of centering/not centering rule 'til I joined this site but several people have mentioned it in reviews of my photos. I have heard of the 'rule' of thirds but totally agree it's not a rule.
reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Sorry for being not clear in my reply. I don't think that there is a rule called centering rule but the rule of thirds is real, This rule is old and were used in paintings long before photography was invented. It is a compositional rule used widely today in all visual art's including photography. With this rule the picture is divided into 9 equal parts by two vertical and two horizontal lines. The important subjects are placed along these lines or the crossing's. It is quite interesting to work with the rule. You could google "rule of thirds, photography". There are some interesting online articles.
Comment from cmyers


Whatever it is...it is beautiful! This has lovely colors, details, clarity, presentation, and composition. I like it centered the way it is...well done.

 Comment Written 21-Nov-2009


reply by the author on 25-Nov-2009
    Thank you, I appreciate your generous review very much.